Second-stage Scrotoplasty with Autologous Tissue Augmentation after Metoidioplasty.

We present our technique for second-stage scrotoplasty with autologous tissue augmentation following gender-affirming metoidioplasty. This technique augments the scrotum while removing the upper labia majora and making the penis more visible and accessible. This procedure avoids the need for testicular prostheses and their potential for discomfort, displacement, extrusion, or infection. Our preliminary results show that the complication rate is low.

The Role of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Principles in Enhancing the Quality of Urologic Resident Education and Advancing Gender Diverse Care.

This article will review the history of trans and gender diverse individuals in the medical field and suggest relevant content and methods to include in a diversity, equity, and inclusion curriculum. The hope is that the inclusion of these methods will help combat the barriers in place to receiving equitable and fair urologic care.

Prostate Cancer in Transgender Women in the Veterans Affairs Health System, 2000-2022.

This case series investigates the rate of prostate cancer diagnoses among transgender women treated in the Veterans Affairs health system.

Robotic Peritoneal Flap vs. Perineal Penile Inversion Techniques for Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss perineal and robotic approaches to gender-affirming vaginoplasty. RECENT FINDINGS: The Davydov peritoneal vaginoplasty has its origins in neovaginal reconstruction for vaginal agenesis. It has been adapted as a robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedure and provides an alternative to perineal canal dissection in gender-affirming vaginoplasty. Both techniques represent variations of penile inversion vaginoplasty with successful outcomes and overall low rates of major complications reported in the literature. However, there are differing advantages and considerations to each approach. A perineal approach has been the gold standard to gender-affirming vaginoplasty for many decades. Robotic peritoneal gender-affirming vaginoplasty (RPGAV) is an emerging alternative, with potential advantages including less reliance on extragenital skin grafts in individuals with minimal genital tissue, especially among patients presenting with pubertal suppression, and safer dissection in revision vaginoplasty for stenosis of the proximal neovaginal canal. Additional risks of RPGAV include those associated with robotic abdominal surgeries.

Genital Hypoplasia in Gender-affirming Vaginoplasty: Prior Orchiectomy, Penile Length, and Other Factors to Guide Surgical Planning.

PURPOSE: Penile inversion vaginoplasty uses genital skin to construct the neovaginal canal. When genital skin is insufficient, extragenital tissue is needed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate which demographic factors and intraoperative anatomical measurements are associated with skin availability and the need for extragenital tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing penile inversion vaginoplasty from May 2016 through January 2021. Preoperative variables included patient demographics, orchiectomy and circumcision status, and stretched penile and scrotal skin lengths. Outcomes included measurements of available scrotal skin surface area and need for extragenital skin graft. RESULTS: A total of 235 patients were included. Patients with prior orchiectomy and shorter stretched scrotal and penile lengths had less scrotal skin available (P < .002) and were more likely to require extragenital skin grafts (P < .001). Patients with prior orchiectomy had 3 times greater odds of needing additional skin grafts. Length of time exposed to gender-affirming hormones did not predict scrotal skin availability (P = .8). CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with need for extragenital skin grafting with penile inversion vaginoplasty were prior orchiectomy and stretched penile skin length <8 cm. Scrotal skin length >10 cm was associated with low risk for needing additional graft. Considering these factors can help with preoperative planning and patient counseling.

Young Adult Healthcare Exposure and Future Opioid Misuse: A Prospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Outpatient opioid prescribing is associated with opioid misuse in young adults, but the longitudinal association between general healthcare exposure and opioid misuse has not been explored. The objective of this study is to examine the association between healthcare exposure in young adulthood and future opioid misuse. METHODS: Data were drawn from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (2001-2018) and analyzed in 2021. Healthcare exposure (i.e., inpatient hospitalization and visits to the clinic, emergency department, mental-health facility, or dentist) between individuals aged 18 and 26 years was the primary independent variable; only patients who did not report opioid misuse at baseline were included. Opioid misuse was defined as using prescription painkillers without a doctor's permission and was measured 17 years after exposure. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine any associations with opioid misuse (ages 33-43 years). RESULTS: A total of 8,225 young adults with a mean baseline age of 21.8 (SE=0.12) years met inclusion criteria. Approximately 13.7% reported new opioid misuse at follow-up. Those reporting opioid misuse at follow-up were more likely to be White, lack a college education, or report depression. Those exposed to inpatient hospitalization, emergency departments, or mental-health facilities had an increased risk of future opioid misuse. CONCLUSIONS: In young adults reporting no opioid misuse at baseline, healthcare exposure was associated with an increased risk of opioid misuse later in adulthood in this large, national cohort. Physicians encounter this at-risk population daily, reinforcing the importance of responsible prescribing practices and the need for targeted screening, patient education, and intervention efforts in the healthcare setting.

A Systematic Approach to Incision Planning and Graft Excision in Gender-affirming Vaginoplasty.

We present our systematic approach to incision planning and skin graft excision for gender-affirming vaginoplasty. This approach is adaptable to patients of different body habitus and genital skin surface area, and it allows for early skin graft harvest with predictable wound tension at closure. We also describe how to adapt in cases of severe genital hypoplasia.

Pre-Operative Assessment Tool To Predict Post-operative Pain and Opioid Use in Outpatient Urologic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the pain requirements of urologic patients in the post-operative outpatient setting. Healthcare providers are one of the leading contributors to the current opioid epidemic. Understanding opioid prescribing practices and patients' narcotic requirements while not over-prescribing opioids is a public health priority. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study to examine opioid consumption among adult patients who presented for outpatient urologic surgery at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) and Zuckerberg San Francisco General (ZSFG) hospitals. We administered a Pre-Operative Pain Requirement Assessment Tool (POPRAT) electronically via text message 3 days prior to surgery to identify objective factors that may predict post-operative pain and opioid requirements. Patients were followed for 7 days post-operatively, in a similar fashion, to assess daily pain, and opioid use. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-four participants were eligible for the study and 211 completed the study. Urology patients undergoing outpatient elective procedures used a mean of 5 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (SD = 14.9) in a 7-day period. Women and patients less than 45 years of age had the highest opioid use. Based on the POPRAT, major predictors of post-operative pain were pre-operative anxiety (0.34 estimate, P value <.001) and anticipated pain (0.34 estimate, P value <.001). Anticipated opioid use, however, did not predict actual opioid use. CONCLUSION: Urologic outpatient surgeries require minimal opioids for pain management. The POPRAT may help identify which patients may experience more pain after surgery. Certain factors such as age and gender may need to be considered when prescribing opioids.

Practitioner counseling associated with improved opioid disposal among families of postoperative pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Death from opioid-related overdose has doubled in recent years. Interestingly, there has been a similar increase in the number of opioid prescriptions. Medical providers, unfortunately, have contributed towards this rise in prescriptions. To combat the opioid epidemic, numerous efforts have been made to focus on the medical field and its role in the opioid epidemic. Proposed solutions for reduction of circulating opioids have included such measures as education, monitoring programs, alternative pain management strategies, and improved opioid disposal. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess if counseling is associated with proper opioid disposal among families of post-operative pediatric patients. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional, convenience sample study of families of post-surgical, pediatric patients at a single academic institution. Participants completed a survey during their postoperative visit assessing opioid requirements, storage and disposal during and after the postoperative period, and if they were counseled by any medical professional on proper disposal methods. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between the independent variables and the primary outcome. RESULTS: We enrolled 180 participants, mean age of 8 years. Thirty-four percent reported having no opioid medication remaining at follow up because the medication was either consumed or the prescription was not filled. Sixty-six percent had leftover medication at the time of follow up. Sixty-six percent of participants knew the proper opioid disposal methods. However, only 22% of patients with leftover medication properly disposed of the medication. Patients who were counseled about proper opioid disposal were 3 times more likely to practice proper disposal practices than those who were not (p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Our study uniquely look at opioid consumption, disposal rates, and the effect of counseling in a diverse post-surgical pediatric population. Our findings confirm similar observations in the literature with regards to low opioid consumption, but in a larger, more surgically diverse cohort with a 100% response rate. Limitations included a lack of demographic diversity and lack of data measuring the impact of timing or frequency of counseling on opioid disposal practices. Further research goals would be to evaluate the effectiveness of counseling on proper opioid disposal, and the influence of timing and various counseling methods. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients do not use all of their opioid medication prescription. Proper opioid disposal counseling by a medical professional may play an important role in adherence to recommended opioid disposal practices.

Patient Satisfaction in a Safety Net Urology Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction has become an important metric in medicine. In this study, we aim to identify modifiable factors contributing toward poor satisfaction amongst patients in a safety net urology clinic. We hypothesize that wait times and long distances traveled to clinic will have the largest contribution toward negative patient experiences. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of adult patients presenting to the urology clinic at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital. Participants completed a survey using the RAND Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18 after their clinic visit. Associations among demographic factors, wait times, use of a translator and satisfaction were examined. RESULTS: Two hundred patients, 19 to 90 years old (median age 62), were enrolled. Overall, 65% of patients were satisfied with their experience in our clinic. Our results demonstrated a significant association among race, language and overall satisfaction scores (p=0.009 and p=0.003, respectively). Multivariable analysis showed that those who waited more than an hour to see a physician were less satisfied compared with those who waited less than 15 minutes (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.74). Similarly, those who used a translator were less satisfied than those who did not use a translator (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.08-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: In a safety net urology clinic, language differences and wait times may contribute to poor patient satisfaction. Future efforts toward improving language interpreter functionality and decreasing patient wait times will likely improve patient satisfaction.

Use of GoFundMe® to crowdfund complementary and alternative medicine treatments for cancer.

PURPOSE: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is common amongst cancer patients. However, there is growing concern about its safety and efficacy. Online crowdfunding campaigns represent a unique avenue to understand the cancer patient's perspective for using CAM or declining conventional cancer therapy (CCT). METHODS: Five hundred GoFundMe campaigns from 2012 to 2019 detailing financial need for cancer treatment were randomly selected and reviewed for endorsement of CAM use, reasons for using CAM, and reasons for declining CCT. Descriptive statistics were used to compare patient and campaign characteristics between 250 CAM users and 250 non-CAM users. RESULTS: Compared to non-CAM users, CAM users were more likely to be female (70% vs. 54%, p < 0.01), to report more stage IV cancer (54% vs. 12%, p < 0.01), and to have a history of delayed, missed, or misdiagnosis (10% vs. 4%, p < 0.01). Reasons for using CAM include endorsing curative/therapeutic effects 212 (85%), pain/stress reduction 137 (55%), and dissatisfaction with current or past medical treatment options 105 (42%). 87 (35%) CAM users that declined CCT reported that they wanted to try to fight off cancer using CAM first 57 (61%), that CCT was too "toxic" to the body 39 (42%), and cancer was already too advanced, so that CCT would be futile or too aggressive 25 (27%). CONCLUSION: Cancer patients on GoFundMe using CAM highly value quality of life, comfort, and autonomy. Physicians should educate themselves on CAM to set realistic expectations and provide comprehensive counseling of the risks and benefits of CAM usage to patients who choose to use CAM to either augment or completely replace CCT.

Promotion Disparities in Academic Urology.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand promotion timelines across gender and race/ethnicity and how academic output impacts promotion in urology. METHODS: We examined the 2017 census. An academic subset was asked questions regarding their promotion timeline. We obtained demographic, academic output, and family responsibility data. RESULTS: Of 2926 academic urologists who identified a position of Assistant, Associate, or Full professor, 11.2% were women, 75% were White, and 94% were non-Hispanic. Men authored more papers and achieved principal investigator status more often than women. Non-Hispanics authored more papers than Hispanics. On average, women took 1.2 years longer than men to advance from Assistant to Associate Professor (7.3 years [95% CI: 6.8-7.8] vs 6.1 years, [95% CI: 5.8-6.6, P <.001]). Advancement from Associate to Full Professor was similar between women and men (6.0 years [95% CI: 5.1-6.9] vs 6.6 [95% CI: 6.1-7.1, P = .25]). Compared to women, men were more likely to experience rapid promotion (≤4 years) to Associate Professor (odds ratio 3 [95% CI: 1.8-5.1]). There was no statistical difference across race/ethnicity for promotion from Assistant to Associate, Associate to Full Professor, or rapid promotion. CONCLUSION: We identified disparities in promotion times based on gender but not race and ethnicity. The number of under-represented minority faculty in urology is low. Understanding the causes of disparities should be a priority in order to support fair promotion practices and retention of diverse faculty.

Forecasting Limited Access to Urology in Rural Communities: Analysis of the American Urological Association Census.

OBJECTIVE: To assess an aging subspecialty workforce and growing population that portends challenges in meeting patient care needs. We hypothesized that rural physicians are retiring at higher rates than their urban counterparts in the United States and that this represents a bellwether for workforce challenges at large. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2014-2016 American Urological Association Census, a sample-weighted representative survey of urologists, as a case study for subspecialists. We compared urologists who work in rural regions to nonrural regions on available characteristics. RESULTS: In 2016, rural urologists accounted for 2.4% of 12,186 practicing urologists in the United States. General urology remained the focus of 90% of rural urologists, compared to 59% of nonrural urologists (P = .03). Alarmingly, 48% of rural physicians were >65 years old in 2016 compared to 29% in 2014, and 33% of rural urologists were solo practitioners compared to 9% of nonrural urologists (P < .01). The planned retirement age for rural physicians increased from 68 in 2014 to 73 in 2016 (P trend = .02). The percentage of rural practice urologists has remained stable since 2014. CONCLUSIONS: Rural urologists are older and provide more general urological care than their nonrural counterparts. Rural urologists are postponing retirement. Although this might be due to personal desires and financial goals, it may also be due to a relative absence of potential junior partners. Given that almost 50% of rural urologists were older than 65 in 2016, this is not a sustainable solution to an impending shortage of physicians. Greater innovation in telemedicine or alternative care models will soon be needed.

Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Predatory journals fail to fulfill the tenets of biomedical publication: peer review, circulation, and access in perpetuity. Despite increasing attention in the lay and scientific press, no studies have directly assessed the perceptions of the authors or editors involved. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to understand the motivation of authors in sending their work to potentially predatory journals. Moreover, we aimed to understand the perspective of journal editors at journals cited as potentially predatory. METHODS: Potential online predatory journals were randomly selected among 350 publishers and their 2204 biomedical journals. Author and editor email information was valid for 2227 total potential participants. A survey for authors and editors was created in an iterative fashion and distributed. Surveys assessed attitudes and knowledge about predatory publishing. Narrative comments were invited. RESULTS: A total of 249 complete survey responses were analyzed. A total of 40% of editors (17/43) surveyed were not aware that they were listed as an editor for the particular journal in question. A total of 21.8% of authors (45/206) confirmed a lack of peer review. Whereas 77% (33/43) of all surveyed editors were at least somewhat familiar with predatory journals, only 33.0% of authors (68/206) were somewhat familiar with them (P<.001). Only 26.2% of authors (54/206) were aware of Beall's list of predatory journals versus 49% (21/43) of editors (P<.001). A total of 30.1% of authors (62/206) believed their publication was published in a predatory journal. After defining predatory publishing, 87.9% of authors (181/206) surveyed would not publish in the same journal in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Authors publishing in suspected predatory journals are alarmingly uninformed in terms of predatory journal quality and practices. Editors' increased familiarity with predatory publishing did little to prevent their unwitting listing as editors. Some suspected predatory journals did provide services akin to open access publication. Education, research mentorship, and a realignment of research incentives may decrease the impact of predatory publishing.

Altruistic donation to improve survey responses: a global randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: Web-based platforms have revolutionized the ability for researchers to perform global survey research. Methods to incentivize participation have been singularly focused on European and North American participants with varied results. With an ever increasing proportion of biomedical research being performed in non-western countries, assessment of novel methods to improve global survey response is timely and necessary. To that end, we created a three-arm nested randomized control trial (RCT) within a prospective cohort study to assess the impact of incentives on survey responsiveness in a global audience of biomedical researchers. RESULTS: Email invitations were sent to authors and editors involved in online publishing totaling 2426 participants from 111 countries. Overall we observed a 13.0% response rate: 13.3% for the control group, 14.4% for a group entered to win a gift card, and 11.1% for a group whose participation lead to donation to charity (p = 0.17). Year of publication nor country impacted response rate. Within subgroups, editors were significantly less likely to respond to the survey as compared to authors (6.5% vs. 18.9%; p-value < 0.01). With power to detect a 4.8% difference among groups, we could not detect an impact of incentives on global survey response.

Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation: Repeat Biopsy and Detection of High Grade Prostate Cancer.

Purpose. Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) is diagnosed in 1-2% of prostate biopsies. 30-40% of patients with ASAP may be diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) on repeat biopsy. Our objective was to examine the association between ASAP and subsequent diagnosis of intermediate/high risk PCa. Materials and Methods. Ninety-six patients who underwent prostate biopsy from 2000 to 2013 and were diagnosed with ASAP were identified. Clinicopathologic features were analyzed. Comparison was made between those with subsequent PCa on repeat biopsy and those with benign repeat pathology. Results. 56/96 (58%) patients had a repeat biopsy. 22/56 (39%) were subsequently diagnosed with PCa. There was no significant difference in patients' characteristics. Presence of HGPIN on initial biopsy was associated with a benign repeat biopsy (68% versus 23%). 17/22 (77%) had Gleason grade (GG) 3+3 disease and only 5/22 (23%) had GG 3+4 disease. Conclusions. 22/56 patients (39%) of patients who underwent a subsequent prostate biopsy following a diagnosis of ASAP were found to have PCa. 77% of these men were diagnosed with GG 3+3 PCa. Only 23% were found to have intermediate risk PCa and no high risk PCa was identified. Immediate repeat prostate biopsy in patients diagnosed with ASAP may be safely delayed. A multi-institutional cohort is being analyzed.